----- Original Message ----- > From: "fredrik danerklint" <fredan-na...@fredan.se>
> > It would do little good; my hit rate on such a cache would be > > unlikely to be high enough to merit the traffic to keep it charged. > > (Children watching a movie only once? Not a chance. It's more like > unlimited number of times and then some more...). "DVD's." "MythTV" > So don't set-up an cache server at your home/residence. I probably won't. But it has become unclear what your fundamental premise and argument are, by this point in the game. Is it: "it is bad that content providers choose a business and technical model wherein local in-home transparent caching proxies won't work?" Cause that's a non-starter. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274