On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500, Jack Bates said: > They are not, and I can think of quite a few people who would stare > blankly at you for making such a statement. Of course, I can think of > plenty of people who we'd like to see implementing BCP38 concepts that > would need you to define ingress and egress.
Of course, the fact they don't understand ingress and egress are *totally* unrelated to the fact they can't figure out how to deploy BCP38, correct?
pgpE00q9ub6UQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
