----- Original Message ----- > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:51:35 -0500, Jack Bates said: > > They are not, and I can think of quite a few people who would stare > > blankly at you for making such a statement. Of course, I can think > > of plenty of people who we'd like to see implementing BCP38 concepts > > that would need you to define ingress and egress. > > Of course, the fact they don't understand ingress and egress are *totally* > unrelated to the fact they can't figure out how to deploy BCP38, correct? Oh, Jeezus; do we need to start seeing geek licenses[1] before we'll turn up your BGP session or Transit link now? Have we really sunk that low?[2] Cheers, -- jra [1] Seriously; I think we need these; for escalating to Tier 3 support if nothing else.[3] [2] No, I don't actually want an answer to this; I'm depressed enough. [3] "Hello, Road Runner business support!" "Yes, my Geek License number is G 17135, and I need to speak to your backbone BGP coordinator." "I'll transfer you right now, sir." -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274