On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:59:16 -0500, Jack Bates said: > On 3/27/2013 4:49 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > > Jack Bates <jba...@brightok.net> wrote: > > > >> 3) BCP38 (in spirit) > > That should be deployed as well as RRL. > > > > Tony. > > If BCP38 was properly deployed, what would be the purpose of RRL outside > of misbehaving clients or direct attacks against that one server?
It would be quite sufficient just for the misbehaving clients aspect.
pgpcmH74KAbr4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
