Hi, > The alternative is to expect "networks" with 100s or 1000s of locations to > burn 100s or 1000s of ASNs. Which I think is a bit silly. Hence my question > about possibly changing the rules.
I see no issue with that, we have an ASN pool of roughly 4294967280 ASNs. There is no shortage. Also BCP6 section 5 [1] would support the philosophy to just get more ASNs when you need to manage multiple islands. Kind regards, Job [1] - http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp6#section-5
