On 12/30/2013 08:03 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:44 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
<valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote:
What percentage of Cisco gear that supports a CALEA lawful intercept mode is
installed in situations where CALEA doesn't apply, and thus there's a high
likelyhood that said support is misconfigured and abusable without being
noticed?
AFAIK, it must be explicitly enabled in order to be functional. It isn't the
sort of thing which is enabled by default, nor can it be enabled without making
explicit configuration changes.
Also, the way that things are integrated it's usually an explicit
decision to pull a piece of functionality
in rather than inheriting it. Product managers don't willingly want to
waste time pulling things
in that a) don't make them money, and b) require support. So I doubt
very seriously that CALEA
functionality is accidentally included into inappropriate things. Doubly
so because of the performance
implications.
Mike