Any website which does not violate the law. In other words, if a lawful takedown order has been applied to a website, this code can’t be used to force an ISP to provide illegal access to said site.
Owen > On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:14 , Jim Richardson <weaselkee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From 47CFR§8.5b > (b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet > access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block > consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable > network management; nor shall such person block applications that > compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services, subject > to reasonable network management. > > What's a "lawful" web site? > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: >> On 02/27/2015 01:19 PM, Rob McEwen wrote: >>> >>> We're solving an almost non-existing problem.. by over-empowering an >>> already out of control US government, with powers that we can't even begin >>> to understand the extend of how they could be abused... to "fix" an industry >>> that has done amazingly good things for consumers in recent years. >>> >> You really should read 47CFR§8. It won't take you more than an hour or so, >> as it's only about 8 pages. >> >> The procedure for filing a complaint is pretty interesting, and requires the >> complainant to do some pretty involved things. (47CFR§8.14 for the complaint >> procedure, 47CFR§8.13 for the requirements for the pleading, etc). Note >> that the definitions found in 47CFR§8.11(a) and (b) are pretty specific in >> who is actually covered by 'net neutrality.' >>