Le 27/02/2015 23:19, Owen DeLong a écrit : > Any website which does not violate the law. > > In other words, if a lawful takedown order
So, subject to legal control rather than simply administrative. Right? mh > has been applied to a website, this code can’t be used to force an ISP to > provide illegal access to said site. > > Owen > >> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:14 , Jim Richardson <weaselkee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From 47CFR§8.5b >> (b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet >> access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block >> consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable >> network management; nor shall such person block applications that >> compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services, subject >> to reasonable network management. >> >> What's a "lawful" web site? >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: >>> On 02/27/2015 01:19 PM, Rob McEwen wrote: >>>> We're solving an almost non-existing problem.. by over-empowering an >>>> already out of control US government, with powers that we can't even begin >>>> to understand the extend of how they could be abused... to "fix" an >>>> industry >>>> that has done amazingly good things for consumers in recent years. >>>> >>> You really should read 47CFR§8. It won't take you more than an hour or so, >>> as it's only about 8 pages. >>> >>> The procedure for filing a complaint is pretty interesting, and requires the >>> complainant to do some pretty involved things. (47CFR§8.14 for the complaint >>> procedure, 47CFR§8.13 for the requirements for the pleading, etc). Note >>> that the definitions found in 47CFR§8.11(a) and (b) are pretty specific in >>> who is actually covered by 'net neutrality.' >>>