On 04/08/15 14:56, Jeroen Massar wrote: > That stated, properly providing a WHOIS entry for each prefix > (inetnum/inet6num) is a good idea as that kind of indicates that that > prefix is fixed in that location and not just moving around.
[skip] > Do make sure though that you do not show any foreign address in the > whois data (even if that is the correct entity that the prefix is > registered under) Seems that it is contrary to each other ;) I thought to do something like automated whois query on tunnel destination and put that (geo)data to each /48 inet6num tunnelled. But as I don't believe it will help, so priority of that task is low and not yet realized.