All GeoIP services would be forced to document their default lat/long values so that users know that when these values, they know it is a generic one for that country. (or supply +181.0000 +91.00000 which is an invalid value indicating that there is no lat/long, look at country code given).
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database ... John Levine
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database ... Matthew Kaufman
- Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database ... Larry Sheldon
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world c... Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world conseq... Steve Atkins
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world c... John Levine
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real wor... Laszlo Hanyecz
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the real... Sean Donelan
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Leo Bicknell
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Larry Sheldon
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Jean-Francois Mezei
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Todd Crane
- RE: GeoIP database issues and the ... Nathan Anderson
- RE: GeoIP database issues and the ... Sven-Haegar Koch
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Laszlo Hanyecz
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Todd Crane
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Jay Hennigan
- Re: GeoIP database issues and the ... Valdis . Kletnieks