On 9/15/16 11:28 AM, Ken Chase wrote: > I feel this can be a public topic: > > Rogers just charged us that for an update (one update, multiple entries). > We had to go through their quotation machinery too, took like 4-5 days. > Additional > time was wasted because we contacted their tech dept directly at the start. > (which > is what I do for all my other upstreams...) > > Kinda brutal. Coordination problems are a point of high friction and cost for low margin products. I generally prefer that my providers be able to generate prefix filters on the basis of route objects, If it's not part of their service offering; how costs are assigned for service requests is going to be part of contract negotiions.
joel > Cogent and HE nor NAC or Yipes or Tata ever did that to us. > > Nickle and diming -- why, cuz transit is a cheap commodity now, gotta make the > cash somewhere? > > That said Cogent offered us a static /26 along side our BGP years ago then > warned > us it'd be $50/mo or something for that # of ips going forward. We didnt need > it > so dispensed with it. > > /kc > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:07:01PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld said: > >If there are any ISPs who use TELUS/AS852 for IP Transit over BGP, I???d > be interested in hearing from you. > > > >I???d like to compare notes to see if you are also paying $250 for each > BGP prefix filter updated request, or if we???re the only ones??? > > > >Thanks in advance! >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
