On Sep 14, 2016, at 4:59 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Bryan Fields <br...@bryanfields.net> wrote: > >> On 9/14/16 3:09 AM, Scott Weeks wrote: >>> >>> Yes, RPKI. That's what I was waiting for. Now we can get to >>> a real discussion >> ... >> sure as heck not going to sign a legally binding contract saying they do :) >> > don't have to... see press.
Chris - To be clear, he would still end up bound to an agreement which provides that they indemnify the RIR regarding their RPKI usage (which was the complaint expressed in the NANOG community regarding ARIN’s RPKI terms and conditions) - <https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/certification/legal/ripe-ncc-certification-service-terms-and-conditions> "The Member shall indemnify the RIPE NCC against any and all third party claims filed against the RIPE NCC in relation to the Member’s use of the RIPE NCC Certification Service or the Certificate.” FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
