Depending on which bit of PSINET Jean is talking about, that could be Cogent.
Edward Dore Freethought Internet > On 22 Dec 2016, at 06:51, Alexander Lyamin <l...@qrator.net> wrote: > > I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between networks on the list > and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent. > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG < > nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > >> Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules. >> >> I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high >> volume of traffic.+10Tbps >> >> ** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could >> initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack. >> >> We talk about an amplification factor x100+. This mean that a single >> computer with 1 Gbps outgoing bandwidth would generate a 100 Gbps DDoS. >> Imagine what a botnet could do? >> >> The list of affected business is huge and I would like to privately >> disclose the details to the Tier1 ISP as they are highly vulnerable. >> >> XO Comm >> PSINET >> Level 3 >> Qwest >> Windstream Comm >> Eearthlink >> MCI Comm/Verizon Buss >> Comcast Cable Comm >> AT&T >> Sprint >> >> I know it's Christmas time and there is no rush in disclosing this but, it >> could be a nice opportunity to meditate and shed some lights on this new >> DDoS threat. We could start the real work in January. >> >> >> If you are curious and you operate/manage one of the network mentioned >> above, please write to me at tornad...@ddostest.me from your job email to >> confirm the identity. I will then forward you the DDoS details. >> >> Best regards >> >> Jean St-Laurent >> ddostest.me >> 365 boul. Sir-Wilfrid-Laurier #202 >> Beloeil, QC J3G 4T2 >> > > > > -- > > Alexander Lyamin > > CEO | Qrator <http://qrator.net/>* Labs* > > office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522) > > mob: +7-916-9086122 > > skype: melanor9 > > mailto: l...@qrator.net
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail