I admit that I have a lot of guts.
Not sure who said that I am a booter or that I operate a booter. I fight
booter since more than 5 years and who would be stupid enough to put his
full name with full address to a respected network operators list?
Definitely not me.
I want to help and fix things and I am not the kind of person to break
things.
Jean
On 16-12-22 03:46 AM, j.j.santa...@utwente.nl wrote:
Hi Jean,
You are either naive or have a lot of guts to offer a Booter service in one of the most
respected network operators list. Man, as long as you use amplifiers (third party services)
or botnets your “service” is illegal & immoral. In case you use your own infrastructure
or rent a legal (cloud) infrastructure to provide your "service" it will not pay
your costs. Not at least by the price that you offer your service: 0, 13, 100 bucks. Even if
you have a legal/moral acceptable attack infrastructure, if you throw those big attacks that
you advertise will possibly take down many others third-parties on the way.
Sometimes you folks say that (mis)use amplifiers for “testing” purpose is not a
problem because those services are open and publicly available on the Internet.
Come on… if I leave my car open with the key inside it doesn’t give you the
right to use my car to throw into a third party company. And if you do, it is
YOUR CRIME, not mine.
I don’t need to explain why using botnets is illegal and immoral, right?
Man, it is up to you decide between cyber crime and cyber security
(https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/public-awareness-and-prevention-guides/cyber-crime-vs-cyber-security-what-will-you-choose).
Now, we are also looking to you on
http://booterblacklist.com<http://booterblacklist.com/>. Thanks!
Cheers,
Jair Santanna
On 22 Dec 2016, at 07:51, Alexander Lyamin
<l...@qrator.net<mailto:l...@qrator.net>> wrote:
I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between networks on the list
and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me<http://ddostest.me/> via NANOG
<
nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote:
Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high
volume of traffic.+10Tbps
** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could
initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack.
We talk about an amplification factor x100+. This mean that a single
computer with 1 Gbps outgoing bandwidth would generate a 100 Gbps DDoS.
Imagine what a botnet could do?
The list of affected business is huge and I would like to privately
disclose the details to the Tier1 ISP as they are highly vulnerable.
XO Comm
PSINET
Level 3
Qwest
Windstream Comm
Eearthlink
MCI Comm/Verizon Buss
Comcast Cable Comm
AT&T
Sprint
I know it's Christmas time and there is no rush in disclosing this but, it
could be a nice opportunity to meditate and shed some lights on this new
DDoS threat. We could start the real work in January.
If you are curious and you operate/manage one of the network mentioned
above, please write to me at
tornad...@ddostest.me<mailto:tornad...@ddostest.me> from your job email to
confirm the identity. I will then forward you the DDoS details.
Best regards
Jean St-Laurent
ddostest.me<http://ddostest.me/>
365 boul. Sir-Wilfrid-Laurier #202
Beloeil, QC J3G 4T2
--
Alexander Lyamin
CEO | Qrator <http://qrator.net/>* Labs*
office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522)
mob: +7-916-9086122
skype: melanor9
mailto: l...@qrator.net<mailto:l...@qrator.net>
