Interesting question whether 2000::/3 or ::/0 is the better default route. >From what I can tell (as OP indicated) most are using ::/0. (I should probably add for those who have not been running V6 for long that for the forseeble future 2000::/3 is the extent of the V6 allocation, the rest being held back for future use. Which is why that could be a default.) Is there any case where 2000::/3 would hurt one? One person mentioned something like 64:ff9b::/96, which per http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml, is the v4 to v6 translator net. Does anyone actually use that? best, dennis
Dennis Bohn Manager of Network and Systems (ret) Adelphi University b...@adelphi.edu On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Shouldn't that be 2000::/3 ? > > Den 2. mar. 2017 17.06 skrev "Aaron Gould" <aar...@gvtc.com>: > > Correction... ::/0 is what I learn from those 3 :) >
