It's a consumer thing. If consumers wanted more options, they would be supporting those options with their wallets. They don't.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Tulyev" <max...@netassist.ua> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 4:43:54 AM Subject: Re: Free access to measurement network So for my point of view, better solution is to push some law that ease access to the buildings for ISPs. 15.12.17 19:40, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu пише: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:42 -0500, Dovid Bender said: >> What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone here >> in the US it would be a good way to measure certain services such as SIP to >> see which ISP's if any are tampering with packets. > > Given previous history, the answer will probably be "most of them". > > "The results are not inspiring. More than 129 million people are limited to a > single provider for broadband Internet access using the FCC definition of 25 > Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload. Out of those 129 million Americans, about 52 > million must obtain Internet access from a company that has violated network > neutrality protections in the past and continues to undermine the policy > today. > > In locations where subscribers have the benefit of limited competition, the > situation isn't much better. Among the 146 million Americans with the ability > to choose between two providers, 48 million Americans must choose between two > companies that have a record of violating network neutrality." > > https://muninetworks.org/content/177-million-americans-harmed-net-neutrality >