(popping back to the top of the thread.. sorry) On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:58 AM nusenu <nusenu-li...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Dear NANOG, > > when I approached ARIN about how they feel about reaching out to their > members about > prefixes that are unreachable in a route origin validation (ROV) > environment, > John Curran (CEO ARIN) referred me to you (see email bellow - quoted with > permission). > > Perhaps this was answered elsewhere, but: "Why is this something ARIN (the org) should take on?" Why can't (or why isn't) this something that 'many' monitoring/alerting companies/orgs are offering? it's unclear, to me, why ARIN is in any better position than any other party to perform this sort of activity? I would expect that, at the base level, "I just got random/unexpected email from ARIN?" will get dropped in the spam-can, while: "My monitoring company to which I signed up/contracted emailed into my ticket-system for action.. better go do something!" is the path to incentivize. The question I asked ARIN was specifically: > > Would you be open to reach out to your affected members to inform them > about > > their affected IP prefixes? > > 'how?' (email to the tech-contact? etc? did they sign up for said monitoring and point to the right destination email catcher?)