On October 7, 2018 at 15:49 fredbaker.i...@gmail.com (Fred Baker) wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> >
> > That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was difficult
> > to ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
> > impaired excepted.)
>
> Where I grew up, the “Civil Defense Warning” was used for air raids, nuclear
> defense, and tornado warnings. By regulation, it was tested monthly. When we
> heard it, which we did, the usual response was “they’re testing the siren
> again” and resumption of the barely-interrupted activity.
No doubt we'll get there with these presidential alerts, just give it
time :-)
I'll get "amber alerts" regionally and just about every time it's
nearly impossible that I could even with the best of intentions do a
thing in response. Some non-custodial parent absconded with two kids
50 miles from here in a black honda or toyota...ok gotcha I'll keep my
eyes peeled...no doubt a terrible and stressful event for those
involved but...
So I tend not to be in a big rush to look at those alerts, actually I
think I turned them off which in that case was an option.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
