On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:48:33 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > true enough. i guess this means that we get IPv6 "as is, where is" > and there will be limited new development of same.
I can't conceive of any possible solution to IPv6 mobility, multihoming, routing, <insert deficiency here> which would find the mere fact that the WG is closed a problem, given that a decade of the WG being *open* didn't produce deployable results.
pgppbvK6nWjMF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
