On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:08:50 +0200 (CEST) Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > > http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-Data-Discrimination.html > > I cannot access relevant pages on www.comcast.com due to me not being > in the US (or rather, they require an address first), could anyone > please paste or other way supply the wording/text they use in their > fineprint, to allow them contractually to disrupt customer TCP > session in other way than delaying or dropping the packets (which I > guess is accepted industry standard). > > Sending/spoofing RST on certain customer TCP sessions doesn't qualify > as normal network behaviour in my mind, so would be interesting to > hear how they word it legally. > See http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9800629-38.html for some relevant excerpts. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
