On Oct 20, 2007, at 4:08 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-Data-
Discrimination.html
I cannot access relevant pages on www.comcast.com due to me not
being in the US (or rather, they require an address first), could
anyone please paste or other way supply the wording/text they use
in their fineprint, to allow them contractually to disrupt customer
TCP session in other way than delaying or dropping the packets
(which I guess is accepted industry standard).
Sending/spoofing RST on certain customer TCP sessions doesn't
qualify as normal network behaviour in my mind, so would be
interesting to hear how they word it legally.
It is interesting that this has come up before in a somewhat related
context
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/06/ignoring_the_gr.html
Regards
Marshall
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
