To improve NDoc's startup time, I like my "NDoc.Documenter.*.dll" naming convention better then using a .config file.
Would the folks from NAnt agree to rename their documenter to "NDoc.Documenter.NAnt.dll"? Is there anyone else using a custom documenter? JC > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Christoph Wille > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:46 AM > To: Jean-Claude Manoli; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Mike Kr�ger' > Subject: RE: [ndoc-devel] ReflectionTypeLoadException > > > There's one question left for me: why do you load all > assemblies anyways? > As long as NDoc remains in a directory of its own, this > behavior is ok - > but as soon as other DLL's start appearing in the directory > (might happen, > not only us being the "bad boys"), you might be loading > assemblies that are > not needed anyways. > > What about a .config file with a custom section that lists > all Documenters > to load? Most people will stick with one Documenter anyways > (reducing the # > of loaded assemblies under .NET is always very good for > performance... > trust us) > > Chris > > At 10:47 AM 8/14/2002 -0400, Jean-Claude Manoli wrote: > >You're right Jason. Now that I look at the code carefully, > I can see > >that the ReflectionTypeLoadException is already caught... I guess > >someone already fixed that (a NAnt programmer I bet). I > just reverted > >my change. > > > >Chris, you should not have the problem with the latest > version from CVS > >or the current nightly archive: http://ndoc.sf.net/ndoc-nightly.zip > > > >JC > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of Jason > > > Diamond > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:34 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Cc: 'Christoph Wille'; 'MikeKr�ger' > > > Subject: RE: [ndoc-devel] ReflectionTypeLoadException > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 07:18, Jean-Claude Manoli wrote: > > > > > > > NDoc loads all "*.dll" assemblies to search for documenter > > > classes. I > > > > have just checked-in a change to only load assemblies > that match > > > > "NDoc.Documenter.*.dll". > > > > > > > > The official build is completely out of date and has > many annoying > > > > bugs, so I suggest that you use the latest version from CVS. > > > > > > Thanks, Jean-Claude. You rock as usual. But I wonder if we just > > > broke NAnt's custom documenter. They call their's > > > NAnt.Documenter.dll. Should we just be catching > > > ReflectionTypeLoadException and continuing on with the > loop if that > > > happens (like what we do with BadImageFormatException)? > > > > > > Christoph, if you don't have CVS setup on your machine, a nightly > > > snapshot is made every morning at 3 AM. So you'd have to > wait until > > > tomorrow to get Jean-Claude's latest fix. > > > > >http://ndoc.sf.net/ndoc-nightly.zip > > > >Jason > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online > job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for > tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code1 > _______________________________________________ > ndoc-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/n> doc-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code1 _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
