Good. Now the NDoc documenters have to conform to the "NDoc.Documenter.*.dll" naming convention.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Shaw, Gerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:59 PM > To: 'Jean-Claude Manoli'; 'Christoph Wille'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Mike Kr�ger' > Subject: RE: [nant-dev] RE: [ndoc-devel] ReflectionTypeLoadException > > > Absolutly not :) > > Sure, when we take a new drop of the Ndoc code we can make the change. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Claude Manoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:30 AM > To: 'Christoph Wille'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Mike Kr�ger' > Subject: [nant-dev] RE: [ndoc-devel] ReflectionTypeLoadException > > > To improve NDoc's startup time, I like my > "NDoc.Documenter.*.dll" naming convention better then using a > .config file. > > Would the folks from NAnt agree to rename their documenter to > "NDoc.Documenter.NAnt.dll"? > > Is there anyone else using a custom documenter? > > JC ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code1 _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
