Hi, * James Geurts wrote on 05.06.2004 (11:54): > the archives shows that this hasn't been brought up for a > little while. I'm thinking that we should push a 0.85 > release out the door. It has been over 5 months since > the last release, and I generally think that a release > would be a good thing. I'm not quite sure what needs to be > done, but I would be
Release later, but stable. That is my opinion when it comes to version runs. Every one or two weeks I look if there's a new nightly build. If so I start using it (in production environment). Don't misunderstand me. I know that from a production point of view, nightly builds seem to be a nightmare. But I never had problems with the nightly builds that broke my buildfile for an upcoming release. Using nightly builds of nant is like using xp in software development. And that is what helps the nant developers to find errors early. Perhaps you want to try a nightly build? Well, and when it's time to release a 0.85? I think it's up to Gert, Scott and others to decide. When looking on the release plan, I see there 4 tasks in progress (all about 70% ready. It might be a good idea to release 0.85 when those features are done. Just my 2 cents, -sa -- sa at programmers-world dot com http://www.livingit.de Internet sites: http://www.not2long.net - Make long links short Boomarks online: http://www.mobile-bookmarks.info ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
