Hello Dominik,
At work, we also use SVN, and so I relate the benefits over CVS. Therefore, I
do agree we should look at different SCM in the future (SVN, Git, Mercurial,
etc).
At this moment, however, I am not clear how changing SCM helps with the
release. Are there some particular issues or concerns which requires the
switching to happen right now? Is it alright if I put this into the roadmap and
defer this until post-1.0 release?
Don't get me wrong, I am not disagreeing with you. I am just concerned about
the timing, and trying to keep all of us focused with the objectives outlined
in 0.87 release.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Charles
> since we are in an early stage of getting drive on nant
> again, I want to
> ask if we could moving away from CVS.
>
> My first proposal is to switch to subversion.
>
> First of all I'm primarily use svn and in addition I have a
> local script
> to convert nant cvs repository into my local svn
> repository.
> If someone wants to take a look I might provide a
> temporarily readonly
> access to my local svn repository on my own server.
>
> There might be some other guys to use another scm like git
> or mercurial.
>
> So let me know what you think.
__________________________________________________________________
Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8.
Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at
http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
