At 4:58 PM -0700 3/20/09, james woodyatt wrote:
> They think the IPv4/NAT model is better
>than the IPv6 model *because* it breaks address referrals. They like
>that referrals generally don't work unless you're in the same address
>realm or there's an application rendezvous service somewhere mediating
>address realm traversal-- *that's* a service that can usually be
>blocked by default and opened only where policy allows.
To put this another way, there is a group of administrators that does not
want to be on the Internet. They do want a set of services delivered over IP.
Have I got that right?
Ted
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
