Ted Hardie wrote: > At 4:58 PM -0700 3/20/09, james woodyatt wrote: >> They think the IPv4/NAT model is better >> than the IPv6 model *because* it breaks address referrals. They like >> that referrals generally don't work unless you're in the same address >> realm or there's an application rendezvous service somewhere mediating >> address realm traversal-- *that's* a service that can usually be >> blocked by default and opened only where policy allows. > > To put this another way, there is a group of administrators that does not > want to be on the Internet. They do want a set of services delivered over IP. > > Have I got that right?
yes, except that they still want to call it the Internet. Keith _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
