>From my perspective the NAT solution that might be specified within 6AI should >be able to deal also with prefixes shorter, equal or _longer_ than a /48 since >there might be ISPs giving out such longer prefixes to their customers. (A reason for that are the changed RIR policies that allow the ISPs freely to decide if they want to give a /48, a /56 or even a /61 to its customers.)
Removing the /48 assumption will have major impact e.g. on Margarets draft. br olaf _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
