On Apr 1, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Margaret and Fred also say, in the abstract of their draft, that they describe "a stateless, transport-agnostic IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Address Translation", in brief a stateless NAT.
Yes, but the use of the term "stateless" seemed to cause considerable confusion at the BOF. I do learn from experience, and I think we should be clearer about what we mean than simply calling NAT66 "stateless".
Margaret _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
