margaret--

I went through my archives of the list.  We've discussed the naming confusion 
issue before, but I don't think a consensus emerged.  Here's what I proposed:

Begin forwarded message:

> From: james woodyatt <[email protected]>
> Date: April 1, 2009 08:56:07 PDT
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [nat66] The case for the name SAT66 to mean stateless NAT66
> 
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 08:41 , Fred Baker wrote:
>> 
>> That said, I think Remi has made a good suggestion here. Calling it 
>> Stateless Address Translation makes sense, I think.
> 
> I could accept either of the following as improvements to the existing order:
> 
>  + Stateless IPv6-to-IPv6 Address Translation (SAT66)
>  + IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (6NPT)
> 
> I prefer the latter term, but the former is fine too.
> 
> I'd prefer either of these over NAT66 on the grounds that I expect it to be 
> easier to teach people that this new and different thing they've never heard 
> of before still breaks some applications, than to try to teach people that 
> conventional NAT44 means dynamic per-host state, NAT64 means dynamic per-host 
> state, but NAT66 means no dynamic state.
> 
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 08:49 , Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> 
>> "NAT" does not mean that it's stateful or stateless. It means it's doing 
>> translation. Using a separate word for stateless IPv6-IPv6 NAT will just add 
>> to the confusion at this point.
> 
> Another reason I prefer IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (6NPT).  It still 
> says translation, but it explicitly constrains the translation to network 
> prefixes only.

When the latest revision of I-D.mrw-nat66 appeared and the name had not 
changed, I assumed that we were still using NAT66 to refer specifically to the 
proposal in the draft we have, and that we do not yet have a good way to refer 
to the sort of IPv6 network address/port translation that Mr. Engel and Mr. 
Marquis have been so vigorously advocating on the list recently.


--
james woodyatt <[email protected]>
member of technical staff, communications engineering


_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to