> So, I
> don't see any consensus to change the name, nor have I been offered a
> compelling reason to do so.
It doesn't matter anyway. The media and the market will call it NAT,
if it's a box that, er, translates network addresses. Let's get
over it.
> Perhaps it would be better to focus this discussion on the technical
> aspects of this proposal, instead of focusing on its name?
Yes.
Brian
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
