RJ Atkinson wrote:
Gentle People,
At the 6AI BOF held at IETF last week, there seemed to be
rough consensus on the definitions for these 2 terms:
IPv6 NAT: Generic term for any sort of NAT/NAPT/SAT
for IPv6::IPv6 deployment
Perhaps a NIT, but from my IEEE experience: IPv6NAT. A single proper
noun versus a NAT variant or a IPv6 bump in the roadmap. For our
purposes, the proper noun is better.
NAT66: Precise, specific, term for the proposal
documented in draft-mrw-behave-nat66-*.txt
I think it would enhance clarity of communication and also
improve understanding if we could all use those terms in the
same way on this list as we tried to use them during the 6AI BOF
at IETF last week.
Thanks,
Ran Atkinson
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
