Fred Baker wrote:
On Apr 3, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But aren't 6-6 and 4-6 special gateway cases that have to do special
things anyway and calling them NATs, while technically correct, masks
their larger role? They are REALLY needed in the 4/6 transition
scheme of things.
While Marcello's proposal is called NAT46, it is not actually a
network address translator. It is an Internet Protocol Translator.
Thank you Fred, that is kind of what I meant to convey. 4-6 and 6-4 have
a lot more work to do and calling them NATs is very misleading. So I
guess we have to get NAT46 a different name ;)
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
