On 3 Apr 2009, at 12:49, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:
Either say that address amplification is forever off the table as a
requirement for IPv6 mechanisms in the space (and I encourage you to
try
to get WG consensus on this matter!), define a better mechanism to
deal
with address amplification than IPv6-to-IPv6 NAPT, or give up and
write
an Internet Draft that defines NAPT66.
Wes,
I have no idea how your quote above relates in any way to anything
that I said. Nothing I said today obviously relates to the topic of
"address amplification".
Cheers,
Ran
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
