> Last, I think this WG ought to explicitly document that one ought never be allocated an IPv6 Routing Prefix longer than 64 bits
Either say that address amplification is forever off the table as a requirement for IPv6 mechanisms in the space (and I encourage you to try to get WG consensus on this matter!), define a better mechanism to deal with address amplification than IPv6-to-IPv6 NAPT, or give up and write an Internet Draft that defines NAPT66. - Wes _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
