Mark Andrews wrote:
NAT44 was a necessary evil as we had effectively run out IPv4 addresses.
This is false. NAT was implemented long, long before there were widespread concerns regarding the number of addresses. A larger reason for NAT was that many of us were using non-routable addresses, as there was (and still is) no business case for any of our internal addresses to be publically routable. Roger _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
