We got a definition for "IPv4 realm", based on RFC 2663 (but also RFC 3103).
Both RFC's are IPv4 oriented, not providing an explicit definition  for an 
"IPv6 realm".
 
This question might be related to NAT66, because the IPv4 realm concept is 
originating from NAT44.
 
Does anyone know a correspondent definition/reference for IPv6 realm?
 
If not, I'd like to offer an initial proposal for discussion, - a common realm 
term for IPv4 and IPv6: 

(IPv4 or IPv6 address) realm: is defined as a set of addresses, which share all 
a common prefix, that are mutually reachable (thus, within a single IP routing 
domain).
  
Note: "IPv6 realm" definition based on the GLOBAL UNICAST ADDRESS format (ยง 
2.5.4/RFC 4291) because this is a hierarchical format using a "global routing 
prefix", which is assigned to a "site" (i.e. sth like a REALM).

Comments would be appreciated,
Albrecht
_____
RFC 2663 IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations

2.1. Address realm or realm



   An address realm is a network domain in which the network addresses
   are uniquely assigned to entities such that datagrams can be routed
   to them. Routing protocols used within the network domain are
   responsible for finding routes to entities given their network
   addresses. Note that this document is limited to describing NAT in
   IPv4 environment and does not address the use of NAT in other types
   of environment. (e.g. IPv6 environments)

    
RFC 3103 Realm Specific IP: Protocol Specification
3.  Terminology
   Private Realm

      A routing realm that uses private IP addresses from the ranges
      (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) specified in
      [RFC1918 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918> ], or addresses that are 
non-routable from the Internet.

   Public Realm

      A routing realm with unique network addresses assigned by the
      Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) or an equivalent address
      registry.

_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66

Reply via email to