On Apr 30, 2010, at 13:26, Chris Engel wrote: > > You are not going to achieve that level of "obscurity" without some form of > address translation....
That's not true. It can also be done with encapsulation. RFC 3103 is an existence proof. > and any solution that you do provide to achieve that obscurity will have much > of the same side effects that todays NAT does. Also not true. As RFC 3103 shows. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
