Maybe. I personally am not sure it needs a name. I agree that it is not a "realm" in the sense that the term is used in IPv4.
On May 2, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Keith Moore wrote: >> I'd like to come back to the concept of a realm and a possible >> definition for "IPv6 realm". > Problem is, we're already using the term "realm" in IPv4 to mean something > different. So while there's definitely a useful concept here to be teased > out, "realm" seems likely to be confusing. > > As an off-the-top-of-my-head suggestion, how about "enclave"? > > Keith > _______________________________________________ > nat66 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66 http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
_______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
