Hi,
Thus wrote [email protected] ([email protected]):
> Section 11 of your draft states that the ULA prefix should be selected
> randomly.
>
> Have you considered selection of ULA prefix(es) for internal network in such
> a manner that it/they can be translated to NAT uplink's /64 prefix in
> checksum neutral fashion?
That will likely not work if you have several prefixes that you want to
translate into.
This is the scenario where prefix translation does not get used to prevent
renumbering but to make multi-homing with several distinct /48 PA to
different uplink providers halfway sane, by delegating the routing
decisions back to the router (NAT66 device) instead of requiring every
host on the LAN to be able to make useful routing decisions and pick
the right source prefix.
regards,
spz
--
[email protected] (S.P.Zeidler)
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
