Hi, Margaret, Fred, Here are a few questions/comments about the document itself (leaving aside for the time being considerations on its purpose, about which we apparently have so far different views).
1. Sec 8, 2nd paragraph Isn't it bits 49-64 instead of 34-48? 2. Sec 11, last paragraph, (rightly) has "NAT66 devices with more than one internal interface SHOULD assign a (non-0xFFFF) subnet" This isn't sufficient. It must also apply to networks that have several NAT66 devices with a single interface in each. Besides, an explanation of why it is so should IMHO be added. - 3. Sec 13 has "it is RECOMMENDED that NAT66 devices include an IPv6 firewall function, and the firewall function SHOULD be configured by default to block all incoming connections." Wouldn't a reference to draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security be appropriate? 4. Sec 15 has a typo in my name. Regards, RD _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
