On Oct 30, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Roger Marquis wrote: >> Would you please not speak of "us security professionals"? I consider >> your attitude toward NAT inacceptable, and do not want to be put into the >> same basket as you. Speak for yourself, don't assume you can speak for >> "most of us security professionals". > > Ok, cansider my statements as applicable to enterprise security > professionals then, the ones with responsibility for edge firewalls, the > overwhelming majority of whom know that NAT is an important security tool > and have no carrier-driven or marketing-driven hidden agendas.
Sorry, no. I know a lot of enterprise security people who are smarter and better informed than that. The people to whom you're referring are those who aren't qualified for their jobs. Admittedly there are a lot of people who fit that description, but we certainly shouldn't let them dictate future Internet architecture. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
