On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Roger Marquis wrote: > A) have yet to provide a detailed rebuttal to the many uses of NAT,
There may be a use that the authors of this document didn't consider, but I know they were attempting to respond to that question in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4864.txt 4864 Local Network Protection for IPv6. G. Van de Velde, T. Hain, R. Droms, B. Carpenter, E. Klein. May 2007. (Format: TXT=95448 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
