On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Roger Marquis wrote: > So please do backup your statements with a list, preferably a long one, > of real world examples of large sites that are getting on without NAT.
one has to define "without NAT". If you mean "without NAT between the network and the upstream, as a security procedure", Cisco is on that list. We have NAT internally as a way to use RFC 1918 addresses in addition to those we have had allocated by our RIRs, but that isn't even address amplification per se. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
