On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hej hej, > > I know I'm picky, anyway: Can you please avoid top postings? > Thanks in advance. Sorry :( > > > > Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 19:06 +0200 schrieb b0unc3: > > however, the way nautilus do FTP is exactly the contrary that I want > > to do, for this reason I talk about simplicity and quickness. > > For example the way nautilus uses to do a simple file upload on an FTP > > Server is far away (imho) from to be quick and maybe also simple. > > You've posted two screenshot mockups of your ideas, but they don't > explain how and where I set up the FTP address after clicking "FTP > Server" or where I define my Flickr account. > And what if I have more than one FTP server? "Quick uploads" also > doesn't mean much to me as a context menu item. Maybe "Upload file(s) to > a server". > Uhm... I will try to explain what's on my mind a little bit more. Take for example an FTP upload. The steps I want to reproduce are : 1) select the file(s) you want to upload 2) select "quick uploads" (or better "Upload file(s) to a server...") and choose the service 3) insert informations (address, directory where to save and eventually the new name of the file on the server) or get it from a previous saved bookmark 4) click ok, and you are done. Well, for managing more ftp servers or more account, I think to add a "bookmarks" functionality to the extension so you don't need to re-insert static information for each upload. > > > > By now I'm deeply looking at Coundit, and on a first impression it > > seems to be oriented in a too different (an more complex) way that I > > need. > > Well, the other way round I can ask "How extensible is your > proposal"? :) > I just would like to avoid duplicating code that already exists and > could be used, e.g. in Conduit... At the moment I don't know "how extensible" my proposal can be. I'm agree on the code reuse, and of course, if I can take some parts from Conduit (or better, use their api) I will do that. > > andre > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hej hej Daniele, > > > > feel free to move this back to the mailinglist. > > > > Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 18:06 +0200 schrieb b0unc3: > > > at the moment I cannot found out how nautilus do FTP (is > > this an > > > extension ?). > > > > > > 1. nautilus --browser > > 2. control+l > > 3. Enter ftp://ftp.gnome.org > > > > > On the other hand I have looked out at Conduit and it do > > very nice > > > stuff, but I think I little be different from what I want to > > do. > > > Principally because many users don't want to take care of > > sync, and > > > need only to upload random files at random places (this is > > my point of > > > view of course). > > > > > > ...and the Conduit code is not helpful to use for that? > > > > > > > I did some pictures on how my idea should become. > > > The [1] is how to make a quick and simple upload way (imho), > > after a > > > simple gui starts [2] and takes care of the rest. > > > I hope I've been more exhaustive , and you have got the > > point. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > Daniele. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012064624824930 > > > [2] > > > > > > http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012073506650114 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Andre Klapper > > <ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:26 +0200, b0unc3 wrote: > > > > I have an idea in my mind. I would like to develop > > an > > > extension for > > > > nautilus that can allow users to simply and > > quickly upload > > > file(s) to > > > > remote service(s). Remote service can be an FTP > > Server or an > > > SSH > > > > Server and make also possible to upload to online > > service > > > like Flickr, > > > > YouTube , picasaweb and so on. > > > > I'd like to know from you if it can be considered > > for a GSoC > > > project. > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > FTP is already possible in nautilus - what is bad > > about the > > > current > > > implementation, or why is it currently not "simple > > and quick" > > > from your > > > point of view? > > > > > > In general: Conduit is a blessed dependency of GNOME > > and > > > provides a > > > framework for parts of this (e.g. picasa, flickr > > etc), see > > > http://live.gnome.org/Conduit for more information. > > > > > > andre > > > -- > > > mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed > > > http://www.iomc.de/ | > > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed > > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > > > > > > > -- > > nautilus-list mailing list > > nautilus-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list > -- > mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > >
-- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list