On 22.08.2006, at 22:13, Stephen Deasey wrote:
I don't see how you will handle the locking... :-(
And I don't see how I'm going to handle config values returned to caller *per reference* (as for the string values) as this is what happens to be the case now :-( If we *ever* want to make this beast shared read/write then we need copy-on-write and copy-on-read access (I guess ref-counting would be simply overkill). Which means radical change to how the config values are handled throughout the server code *and* extensions. Ah, I really hate it! Which leaves me 3 possible choices: 1. Go climb the Eiffel tower and throw myself down 2. Go climb the Empire State Building and throw myself down 3. Write our own module for handling configuration I desperately wanted to avoid 3. (for simple reasons). I have very little chices left. (Confused and disappointed) Zoran
