SF in general but CVS in particular, i remember offered to switch to SF SVN, but i could not find good enough reasons.
With CVS i know that it does not handle directories, renaming, moving and i do not even try to do it, contacting SF everytime to cleanup CVS is not very convenient either. So, at least moving to SVN will make it much easier to control our repository, we can still stick with SF, i am not insisting. Vasiljevic Zoran wrote: > On 03.05.2008, at 21:14, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > >> i do not have big >> enough reason beside my not-liking Sf service. > > > Just to be clear... SF supports both CVS and SVN. > Is the SF in general that you do not like or is > it the CVS especially? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > -- Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
