Thanks - that stops the seg fault... it does seem to leave a lot of zombies
though. This is the output during the ns_proxy test:
[15/May/2017:15:03:47][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy
proxy testpool-8
[15/May/2017:15:03:48][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7590 won't die, send signal 15
[15/May/2017:15:03:48][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy
proxy testpool-8
[15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7590 won't die, send signal 9
[15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7591 won't die, send signal 15
[15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy
proxy testpool-8
[15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy:
zombie: 7590
[15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7591 won't die, send signal 9
[15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7621 won't die, send signal 15
[15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy
proxy testpool-8
[15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy:
zombie: 7591
[15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7621 won't die, send signal 9
[15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7622 won't die, send signal 15
[15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy:
zombie: 7621
[15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7622 won't die, send signal 9
[15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning:
[testpool]: pid 7640 won't die, send signal 15
[15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Error: process
7640 killed with signal 15 (Terminated)
[15/May/2017:15:03:53][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy:
zombie: 7622
On 15 May 2017 at 14:45, Gustaf Neumann <neum...@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> Am 15.05.17 um 15:15 schrieb David Osborne:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > This does indeed seem to fix the test case I sent -
> good
> > however I'm now getting a segmentation fault during the "make test".
> bad
>
> i've made the code more robust .... although it is not clear to me yet,
> how the
> proxy can be "Busy" without having a slave... maybe a race condition. I
> will check.
> -g
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> naviserver-devel mailing list
> naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
