On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
I believe most logical choice is git. I'm not fan of any of the systems, to be honest.
Yes, it seems. I am also not a fan of anyone, and much less of this inflation of versioning systems. But I see advantages of CVS and fossil, in quite very different issues: the first because it saves everything as rcs files, the seccond because of its simplicity, flexibility, everything (repo, wiki, tickets, etc) integrated in a single sqlite file that can be moved in the file system or to other computer as a normal file, simple commands that also remind cvs. I am not a professional programmer, do not have a lot of experience with this systems, but I use fossil (not in its full power) for my personall small programs. It is also the system used in tcl/tk and many tcl projects. Perhaps the following is interesting: https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/inout.wiki https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/mirrortogithub.md Rodrigo _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel