What I learned from a test lab is the RBOC's have no interest in surging
interfaces using coaxial cables.

Joe Finlayson wrote:

>         I am hearing mixed opinions of whether a DS3 Coax interface falls
> under the scope of interfaces to be subjected to GR-1089 4.5.9 Intrabuilding
> Lightning Surge.  The way I interpret the standard is that it does fall
> under the scope as there is no clear definition, that I could find, for
> "Telecommunications Port".  I've seen verbiage citing examples, but no clear
> definition.  This interface will not connect to outside plant and I do wish
> to claim shielded cables with grounds at both ends to avoid the testing.
> The scope of Section 4.6 clearly eliminates DS3 as part of that section.
> The program team is against testing it and I would not like to see a
> prospective customer reject the report.  Any and all feedback and opinions
> from the group (RBOC's especially) would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thx,
>
> Joe
>
> *********************************
>  <<...>>
>
> Joe Finlayson
> Manager, Compliance Engineering
> Telica, Inc.
> 734 Forest Street, Bldg. G, Suite 100
> Marlboro, MA 01752
> Tel:    (508) 480-0909 x212
> Fax:    (508) 480-0922
> Email:  jfinlay...@telica.com
> Web:    www.telica.com

Reply via email to